
 |
Working with David A Hodder Moa Book, published by Hachette Livre NZ Ltd, 2008 |

 |
The Myers David Ling Publishing Limited, 2007 (Written with Paul Goldsmith) |

 |
Roderick Deane: His Life & Times Penguin Group (NZ), 2006 (Written with Judith Bassett) |

 |
Coates of Kaipara Auckland University Press, 1995 |

 |
The Essentials of Successful Leadership in Twentieth Century New Zealand Politics Political Science, Volume 51 No. 2, December 1999, pp.108-119. |

 |
Tomorrow Comes the Song: A Life of Peter Fraser Penguin Books, 2001 (Written with Michael King) |

 |
The State in New Zealand 1840-1984: Socialism without Doctrines? Auckland University Press, 1998 |

 |
Sir Joseph Ward: A Political Biograph Auckland University Press, 1993 |

 |
The Mother of All Departments The history of the Department of Internal Affair Auckland University Press, 1997 |

 |
Three Party Politics in New Zealand 1911-1931 Historical Publications, 1982 |

 |
The Third Labour Government Dunmore Press, 1976 |

 |
CONFRONTATION '51 The 1951 Waterfront Dispute Reed Books, 1972 |
|
 |
 |
The Third Labour Government
Dunmore Press, 1976
|
|
Writing in the last week of December 1975, the New Zealand Herald's political
correspondent, Don Milne, commented:
It is perhaps not too much to expect that future historians will judge the third
Labour Government rather more kindly for at least some of its achievements than
did the New Zealand voter on November 29.
This book about the 1972-5 Labour government headed by Norman Kirk then Bill
Rowling is written by a professional historian, one who left the academic world to
be a government backbencher in that parliament. Throughout the period he recorded
impressions of events as they happened, imagining that one day he would write about
his experiences in the House. Events on 29 November 1975 brought the date of
writing forward. The book is not the one that Don Milne envisaged. Nor is it the
kind of work that any non-participating historian would be likely to write. It is
a participant's view. And while it lacks some objectivity, it most certainly will
convey contemporary feeling and atmosphere that a later historian would find hard
to recapture.
|
|
|